🔗 Share this article

Per a fresh examination, numerous of personnel with experience in the fossil fuel field have been appointed within the current administration, comprising above 40 who previously worked directly for gas firms.

Overview of the Report

This report investigated the profiles of appointees and personnel working in the executive branch and multiple national agencies overseeing environmental regulation. These cover important entities including the environmental agency, the Interior Department, and the Energy Department.

Larger Administrative Environment

The analysis surfaces during continuing actions to dismantle energy policies and clean energy supports. For instance, recent acts have opened large areas of government property for extraction and reduced funding for renewable power.

With the firehose of negative things that have happened on the environment front... it’s crucial to educate the public that these aren’t just measures from the amorphous, ginormous thing that is the administration broadly, said one author participating in the analysis. They are frequently specific players coming from particular powerful groups that are implementing this harmful anti-regulatory plan.

Key Findings

Researchers identified 111 personnel whom they deemed as industry insiders and renewable energy opponents. This includes 43 people who were directly working by oil companies. Included in them are well-known top officials including the energy secretary, who previously acted as CEO of a hydraulic fracturing company.

This group furthermore features lesser-known administration personnel. For instance, the office responsible for energy efficiency is led by a former fracking manager. Similarly, a senior energy counsel in the administration has occupied top-level jobs at large petroleum corporations.

Further Connections

Another 12 officials have links to industry-backed libertarian thinktanks. Those cover ex- staff and fellows of organizations that have strongly resisted renewable energy and promoted the use of fossil fuels.

Additionally 29 other appointees are ex- business managers from heavy industry industries whose business interests are directly linked to fossil fuels. Additional personnel have connections with energy companies that market fossil fuels or elected leaders who have advocated pro-coal policies.

Agency Concentration

Analysts found that 32 personnel at the interior agency individually have connections to fossil fuel energy, making it the highest influenced national department. This encompasses the leader of the department, who has repeatedly taken industry donations and functioned as a link between energy sector donors and the campaign.

Political Contributions

Fossil fuel supporters provided substantial resources to the campaign operation and inauguration. After taking office, the administration has not only established industry-friendly policies but also crafted benefits and tariff carveouts that favor the sector.

Expertise Issues

Besides industry-linked candidates, the authors identified a number of government officials who were selected to key jobs with little or no relevant experience.

Those individuals may not be linked to fossil fuels so explicitly, but their unfamiliarity is dangerous, said a analyst. It is reasonable to think they will be compliant, or susceptible individuals, for the energy sector’s objectives.

For instance, the nominee to lead the EPA’s division of chief legal officer has minimal litigation experience, having not once argued a lawsuit to verdict, never participated in a deposition, and nor presented a legal request.

During an additional example, a executive advisor dealing on energy policy came to the position after being employed in jobs unrelated to the sector, with no apparent specific energy industry or administrative expertise.

Administration Reaction

One representative for the White House criticized the findings, saying that the leadership’s appointees are highly competent to execute on the public’s instruction to increase national resource development.

Historical and Current Backdrop

This government oversaw a significant series of anti-environmental steps during its initial tenure. In its present tenure, prepared with rightwing plans, it has initiated a much wider and harsher dismantling on climate regulations and clean power.

There’s no embarrassment, stated a expert. They are proud and ready to go out there and tout the fact that they are doing favors for the energy industry, extractive field, the mining industry.